整个网络 最新的文章 最热门的*五*个话题 非主流虹语 MACs 业界新闻 互联网

四月 07, 2008

Yahoo 第二次正式答复微软:哥们儿,给点面子,加点钱吧?

由. Z'HuNG 将文章归档于 雅虎

Yahoo 第二次正式答复微软:哥们儿,给点面子,加点钱吧?

针对前几天微软的最后通牒,几个小时前路透社爆料称 Yahoo 又要来个严词拒绝了,不过事实上还没那么糟糕,因为刚刚 Yahoo 正式答复微软了,公开文稿中表明了一些态度,认为微软应该多出点钱,他们也不是不愿意坐下来好好谈。不过,都到这份上了,Yahoo 到底有什么资本,到底哪里好意思要微软加价了?HUNG 是没看出来。Yahoo 在公开的回复当中倒是对自己充满信心,当然,在措辞上已经显露出一部分由硬变软的趋势:

"Steve, you personally attended two of these meetings and could have advanced discussions in any way you saw fit..."

以下是以杨致远和 Roy Bostock 联合名义发出的官方答复

Yahoo!'s Board of Directors Responds to Latest Microsoft Letter

SUNNYVALE, Calif., Apr 07, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -The Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO), a leading global Internet company, today sent the following letter to Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive Officer of Microsoft Corporation.

Dear Steve:

Our Board has reviewed your most recent letter with regard to the unsolicited proposal you made to acquire Yahoo! on January 31, 2008.

Our Board carefully considered your unsolicited proposal, unanimously concluded that it was not in the best interests of Yahoo! and our stockholders, and rejected it publicly on February 11, 2008. Our Board cited Yahoo!'s global brand, large worldwide audience, significant recent investments in advertising platforms and future growth prospects, free cash flow and earnings potential, as well as its substantial unconsolidated investments, as factors in its decision.

At the same time, we have continued to make clear that we are not opposed to a transaction with Microsoft if it is in the best interests of our stockholders. Our position is simply that any transaction must be at a value that fully reflects the value of Yahoo!, including any strategic benefits to Microsoft, and on terms that provide certainty to our stockholders.

Since disclosing our Board's position with respect to your proposal, we have presented our three-year financial and strategic plan to our stockholders, which supports our Board's determination that your unsolicited proposal substantially undervalues Yahoo!. Those meetings with our stockholders have also provided us an opportunity to hear their views.

We have continued to launch new products and to take actions which leverage our scale, technology, people and platforms as we execute on the strategy we publicly articulated. Today, in fact, we are announcing AMP! from Yahoo!, a new advertising management platform designed to dramatically simplify the process of buying and selling ads online.

Finally, our Board has been actively and expeditiously exploring our strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value, a process which is ongoing. All of these actions have been driven by our overarching commitment to maximize stockholder value.

Our Board's view of your proposal has not changed. We continue to believe that your proposal is not in the best interests of Yahoo! and our stockholders. Contrary to statements in your letter, stockholders representing a significant portion of our outstanding shares have indicated to us that your proposal substantially undervalues Yahoo!. Furthermore, as a result of the decrease in your own stock price, the value of your proposal today is significantly lower than it was when you made your initial proposal.

In contrast to your assertions about the effect of general economic conditions on our business, Yahoo!'s business forecasts are consistent with what we outlined in our last earnings call. As you know, we recently reaffirmed our Q1 and full year guidance, which is a testament to our ability to perform in line with our expectations despite the current economic environment. In addition, our three-year financial and strategic plan which we have made public demonstrates significant potential upside not previously communicated to the financial markets. This plan has received positive feedback from our stockholders, further strengthening the view that Yahoo! is worth well more as a standalone company than the value offered in your proposal, and would be even more valuable to Microsoft. Your own statements have made clear the strategic importance of Yahoo!'s substantial assets and capabilities to Microsoft.

We regret to say that your letter mischaracterizes the nature of our discussions with you. We have had constructive conversations together regarding a variety of topics, including integration and regulatory issues. Your comment that we have refused to enter into negotiations to conclude an agreement are particularly curious given we have already rejected your initial proposal, nominally $31 per share at the time, for substantially undervaluing Yahoo! and your suggestions in your letter and the media that you are considering lowering the value of your proposal. Moreover, Steve, you personally attended two of these meetings and could have advanced discussions in any way you saw fit.

As to antitrust, we have discussed with you our concerns. Any transaction between us would result in a thorough regulatory review in multiple jurisdictions. As a follow up to a recent meeting among our respective legal advisors we had on this topic, and at your request, we provided to you on March 28 a list of additional information we would need to further our understanding of the regulatory issues associated with any transaction. To date, you have still not provided any of the requested information.

We consider your threat to commence an unsolicited offer and proxy contest to displace our independent Board members to be counterproductive and inconsistent with your stated objective of a friendly transaction. We are confident that our stockholders understand that our independent Board is best positioned to objectively and knowledgeably evaluate our Company's alternatives and to maximize value.

In conclusion, please allow us to restate our position, so there can be no confusion. We are open to all alternatives that maximize stockholder value. To be clear, this includes a transaction with Microsoft if it represents a price that fully recognizes the value of Yahoo! on a standalone basis and to Microsoft, is superior to our other alternatives, and provides certainty of value and certainty of closing. Lastly, we are steadfast in our commitment to choosing a path that maximizes stockholder value and we will not allow you or anyone else to acquire the company for anything less than its full value.

Very truly yours,

Roy Bostock Jerry Yang
Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer

广告


固定链接: Yahoo 第二次正式答复微软:哥们儿,给点面子,加点钱吧?
关键词: 微软  收购  Yahoo  业界动态 

引用: http://www.creative-weblogging.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.pl/119367



广告


广告


广告


CW工具栏安设
RSSrss   | 所有的部落格订阅选择
Googlegoogle  |   什么是RSS?
YodaoYodao
Netvibes Netvibes
AnothrAnothr
时事通讯
点击联系广告合作.

使用我们的搜索寻找其他有趣的文章

这blog而已 全网络
广告 -
这里订您的.


 
点击联系广告合作.


  • 推荐书

  • "每天过滤一大堆信息选出来一些精品给大家很难,需要花费大量的时间和精力,且往往得不到相应的回报(可能他们看到那个惊人的PV,已经满足了)。"
    - from DaTou

    "息乐园,真的是恰如其分的名字,无论你是新来路过此地的菜鸟还是已经拱地三尺终日潜水的老鸟,在息乐园都能随意交流、任意拍砖;虹提供的内容也是丰富多彩,有最新的资讯(乐园最吸引人的东西),有各种风格的音乐,有感情,有……其实更加精彩的应该是各位路过的XDJM、经常流连乐园的常客给虹的数千留言。"
    - from Chris

    "不拘一格、随性、给人轻松的感觉。"
    - from blogsir

    "网谈是少有的、能跟上国际节奏的国产博客。其写作时间也是非常的早,站长Hung算的上是国内的第一批Blogger。"
    - from Conyee

    "他总是无私的分享这些实用信息给大家,并幽然自乐在其中。"
    - from Sunny

    "一个更新比较勤奋且有见地的WEB2.0评论Blog。"
    - from 365RSS.cn

    "CW中文区的主编HUNG本身,也是一位非常勤奋的Blogger,他对Blogging的坚持令人钦佩。同时,他也为CW中文区日常的管理和协调工作耗费了很多精力。可以说,CW中文区的成功和他的努力是分不开的。"
    - from WebLeOn

  • Other blogs in the same channel in the Creative Weblogging Network

广告 -
这里订您的.